> The thing is, that they have used an entirely different type of > processor in the 1G (PortalPlayer instead of ARM). Both are ARM processors. It's just PortalPlayer vs. Samsung. PortalPlayer and ARM are two different things.
> Once we have all parts of the nano2G bootloader (I'm still waiting for the > internal ROM image), it will be pretty easy to find out how it works ant > what is what in the image. Until then... Well, I'll wait. I doubt that > we can make any major progress without having that ROM's contents. > I completely agree with that point. It's not very likely to decrypt the flash parts without having the code of the embedded processor ROM. If tof successfully dumps it, it's just a matter of days :-) > Nevertheless it would be interesting, whether they used a similar kind > of sections/images/files/whatever you call them in the 1G flash. I doubt > that this knowledge will help anyone, I'm just curious, so I'll have a > look at that one later. > The 1G flash also has these sections. "flshdisk", "flshdiag", "flshlogo", but no "logo". And there are no 512 byte headers like in the dumped 2G flash. --Felix _______________________________________________ Linux4nano-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/linux4nano-dev http://www.linux4nano.org
