Mike Madore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> > In addition, SNA itself is more of a datagram protocol, which the
> > tn5250 datastream emulates with GA.  It might be easier to deal with
> > this if tn5250 gets ported to SNA, if buffering is implemented now.
> 
> I assume you are talking about the lower layers?  

I think I should have thought about it a bit more before sending that
off.  It doesn't really make that much difference.

However, I've been fortunate enough to work on SNA communications
between an AS/400 and a DOS PC.  Part of the protocol stack used (SNA?
LU 6.2?)  sends and receives the data in specified size packets, not
as a bytestream like TCP.

-- 
         Carey Evans  http://home.clear.net.nz/pages/c.evans/

"Validate me!  Give me eternal digital life!  Quote me in your .sigs!"
                                                             - djc in asr
+---
| This is the LINUX5250 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| To subscribe to this list send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+---

Reply via email to