Re: Bug busting session next week.

[Mike Madore]

> > I assume you are talking about the lower layers?  
> 
> I think I should have thought about it a bit more before sending that
> off.  It doesn't really make that much difference.
> 
> However, I've been fortunate enough to work on SNA communications
> between an AS/400 and a DOS PC.  Part of the protocol stack used (SNA?
> LU 6.2?)  sends and receives the data in specified size packets, not
> as a bytestream like TCP.

I see what you mean.  LU 6.2 has record bounderies that the programmer is
aware of that you don't see in TCP.

What I thought you meant was that SNA was a connectionless protocol, which
obviously it is not.

Mike

+---
| This is the LINUX5250 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| To subscribe to this list send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+---