Our lib5250 is already a "5250 emulation API", why reinvent the wheel?
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, sorry if this is offtopic... > I'm working on a 5250 emulation API. Most of the work has been done, but I > am experiencing cursor positioning problems, and noticed in the archives > that this seems to be a common issue. > > Looking through the tn5250j emulator code, I noticed that IC and MC orders > are treated the same (so it's broken there as well). > > I also looked through the TN5250 code, but still apparently can't figure > out my problem. > Could someone give me a consice set of rules for cursor placement used in > TN5250? I've been working on this for a while so I "speak the language". > I do have the "Function Reference" but you all know that this is a terrible > reference from an implementation standpoint. > > Any help would be much appreciated. > > > Mark. > markb > at > cms400 > dot > com > > P.S. Thanks for TN5250. > > _______________________________________________ > This is the Linux 5250 Development Project (LINUX5250) mailing list > To post a message email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/linux5250 > or email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives > at http://archive.midrange.com/linux5250. > _______________________________________________ This is the Linux 5250 Development Project (LINUX5250) mailing list To post a message email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/linux5250 or email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/linux5250.
