In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kiss Gabor) writes:
> Az iperf TCP-vel a kliens ezt mutatja:
>
> [ 4] local 192.168.1.9 port 54558 connected with 192.168.1.201 port 32888
> [ 4] 0.0-10.0 sec 95.4 MBytes 80.0 Mbits/sec
> [ 4] local 192.168.1.9 port 32888 connected with 192.168.1.201 port 33919
> [ 4] 0.0-10.2 sec 69.9 MBytes 57.3 Mbits/sec
>
> UDP-vel pedig:
> [ 4] local 192.168.1.9 port 33198 connected with 192.168.1.201 port 32888
> [ 3] local 192.168.1.9 port 32888 connected with 192.168.1.201 port 33893
> [ 3] 0.0- 9.8 sec 1.23 MBytes 1.06 Mbits/sec 0.947 ms 14/ 893 (1.6%)
> [ 4] 0.0-10.0 sec 1.25 MBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec
> [ 4] Sent 893 datagrams
> [ 4] Server Report:
> [ 4] 0.0-10.2 sec 2.50 MBytes 2.07 Mbits/sec 0.978 ms 0/ 893 (0%)
> Mindjart beteszem ujra a kis 5 portos SOHO switchet kozejuk, es megismetlem
> a merest.
Most maszik ki a majom a vizbol!
TCP:
[ 4] local 192.168.1.9 port 46776 connected with 192.168.1.201 port 32888
[ 5] local 192.168.1.9 port 32888 connected with 192.168.1.201 port 33921
[ 4] 0.0-10.0 sec 28.5 MBytes 23.9 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 0.0-10.0 sec 64.1 MBytes 53.5 Mbits/sec
UDP:
[ 4] local 192.168.1.9 port 33199 connected with 192.168.1.201 port 32888
[ 3] local 192.168.1.9 port 32888 connected with 192.168.1.201 port 33895
[ 4] 0.0-10.0 sec 1.25 MBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec
[ 4] Sent 893 datagrams
[ 4] Server Report:
[ 4] 0.0-10.0 sec 2.50 MBytes 2.11 Mbits/sec 0.078 ms 0/ 893 (0%)
[ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 1.25 MBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 0.060 ms 0/ 893 (0%)
Azt gondolna az ember, hogy a kis Linksys rosszabbul teljesitett,
mint a nagy KTI. (TCP-vel, es azonosan UDP-vel.)
De kozben a sambas file-masolas sebessege maradt 5 MB/s korul,
viszont a kis switch-csel az NFS sebessege 1-rol 10 MB/s-ra ugrott fel.
kissg
_________________________________________________
linux lista - linux@mlf.linux.rulez.org
http://mlf2.linux.rulez.org/mailman/listinfo/linux
