That's odd. My understanding might be lacking. I think the PIRQ table parser in 2.6.10 seems to work because it works when I use the normal BIOS. Therefore allowing the inference that 2.6.10 can read the table that was generated by the normal BIOS, right? What do you think? I'm now reading through the Alan Cox/Christer geode PIRQ discussion to see if I missed something.
--- "Ronald G. Minnich" <rminnich@lanl.gov> wrote: > > > On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, ramesh bios wrote: > > > I used Linux 2.6.10. I'm reading through the list > > archive now for any related kernel issues. > > From 2.4.19 on, the IRQ parser for PIRQ tables for > geodes is broken. > > That could be part of the problem. > > ron > _______________________________________________ > Linuxbios mailing list > Linuxbios@clustermatic.org > http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - Sign up for Fantasy Baseball. http://baseball.fantasysports.yahoo.com/ _______________________________________________ Linuxbios mailing list Linuxbios@clustermatic.org http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
