Hi, On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 10:48:33PM +0100, Peter Stuge wrote: > Speaking of the DCO, we are using the verbatim text of the DCO 1.1 > but we have renamed it to "LinuxBIOS Developer's Certificate of > Origin 1.1" on the wiki page.
Good point. > Was that intentional? Yes, but that was wrong. I renamed it because I misread the 'If you modify you must use a name or title distinguishable from "Developer's Certificate of Origin"' below. If we do _not_ modify the DCO, we can still also keep the name (that's how I understand it at least). I reverted my renaming, it's called "Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1" again now. Thanks for pointing that out. > The original DCO has the following copyright notice: > "© 2005 Open Source Development Labs, Inc. The Developer's > Certificate of Origin 1.1 is licensed under a Creative Commons > Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. If you modify you must use a name > or title distinguishable from "Developer's Certificate of Origin" or > "DCO" or any confusingly similar name." Uwe. -- http://www.hermann-uwe.de | http://www.holsham-traders.de http://www.crazy-hacks.org | http://www.unmaintained-free-software.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- linuxbios mailing list linuxbios@linuxbios.org http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios