Dinesh, Rony, > > As i could understand it, the GPL requires that the binary > > distribution should be accompanied with a *written offer* of source > > code availability. I am sure there is no such written offer present > > anywhere right now and there has been a voilation. Heh, now let's put an end to this thread. It has been established well that the PCQ people are nothing but a bunch of jokers. They have no feeling for the FOSS community and neither do they know about the way it works. Whenever people have tried working in the cathedral fashion like them, people have failed. What happened to them was just inevitable. I have never used PCQLinux myself, but I have always noticed it to be a lousy hack of Red Hat / FC. Just a few years back, I was reading some Credits or Readme file in the PCQLinux distro ... I found out that they had done a search-and-replace on all email IDs listed in the file. So it became [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], and stuff like that. That helped me in understanding their level of expertise and I never looked at a PCQLinux CD again. They are just a bunch of morons. Period. Regards, BG
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
