On Tuesday 30 December 2008 18:01, Kartik Mistry wrote: > On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 5:46 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves <law...@au-kbc.org> wrote: > >> I think I missed it the first time. Virtual Box seems to > >> have dual licenses. One that is GPL and another proprietary > >> license for the enterprise level product. > > > > then it is not FOSS and we need not worry about it here > > It is. > > Please don't spread FUD. >
The "other" licence (PUEL) is definetly not FOSS. It is a closed personal, non-exclusive, non-transferable, limited license. Any use beyond the provisions of personal use is prohibited and you may not modify the product in any way. -- Rgds JTD -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
