2009/1/1 jtd <[email protected]>: > The rule for interpretation is extremely simple > 1) does the term commercial appear in the licence > 2) does the licence refer to notice.txt > > If any one of the two do, the licence is not GPL. If neither do, it is > GPL
I give up. I tried my best to explain what I know. If you plan to use it, contact Nokia legal. > I am belabouring this because i dont want to download the whole source > tarball to get at the licence. > Can someone post the licence or a url for this specific licence. http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/q/qt4-x11/qt4-x11_4.4.3-1/copyright -- പ്രവീണ് അരിമ്പ്രത്തൊടിയില് <GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call! <DRM> What use is a phone call, if you are unable to speak? (as seen on /.) Join The DRM Elimination Crew Now! http://fci.wikia.com/wiki/Anti-DRM-Campaign -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
