On Friday 02 Jan 2009 11:24:00 am Praveen A wrote: > 2009/1/1 Kenneth Gonsalves <law...@au-kbc.org>: > > because there is a dispute about the meaning of the terms. There is no > > dispute about the meaning of the terms 'commercial' and 'proprietary'. > > If it were that simple RMS would not have to maintain this. > http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Commercial
RMS has a habit of making simple things complicated ;-) I am quite sure that nokia knows the difference between commercial and proprietary and insist on the commercial license for commercial free software. -- regards Kenneth Gonsalves Associate NRC-FOSS http://nrcfosshelpline.in/web/ -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
