>> It might be worth checking that there isn't a particular reason for >> these. Just because posting writes are forbidden doesn't mean a >> particular bridge won't screw it up... > > Well, I had already checked with Ben, who wrote the code, and my > understanding is that the reads are intended to work around some > misbehaving Apple bridges,
None of the PCI interfaces on the U3 or U4 bridges have that problem as far as I know. I think the workaround was copied from code for older Apple bridges? > but that a sync after the write (implied by > releasing pci_lock in the generic pci code) should suffice for those. I don't see how a sync could help here at all, not more than an eieio anyway? Segher _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev