On Friday 12 October 2007, Li Yang wrote: > + > [EMAIL PROTECTED] { > + compatible = "fsl,mpc8315-sata"; > + reg = <19000 1000>; > + interrupts = <2d 8>; > + interrupt-parent = < &ipic >; > + phy-handle = < &serdes1 >; > + };
I believe we should really have a generic way to probe ATA ports as long as they are compatible to the standard register set, and use a generic of-ata driver for that. The two questions arising there are: 1. Should there be a new device-type for ATA? Alternatively we would only look at the "compatible" property, maybe looking for a generic "ata" name. 2. How do we make sure the of-ata driver and the specific (e.g. sata_fsl) driver don't fight over the same devices? Would it be enough to reject all known specific devices in of_ata_probe? Arnd <>< _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev