On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 20:22:14 +0530 Madhavan Srinivasan <ma...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Two #defs LAZY_INTERRUPT_ENABLED and > LAZY_INTERRUPT_DISABLED are added to be used > when updating paca->soft_enabled. This is a very nice patchset, but can this not be a new name? We use "soft enabled/disabled" everywhere for it. I think lazy is an implementation detail anyway because some interrupts don't cause a hard disable at all. Thanks, Nick _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
