On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 11:35:16 +0530 Madhavan Srinivasan <ma...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 July 2016 10:57 AM, Nicholas Piggin wrote: > > On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 20:22:14 +0530 > > Madhavan Srinivasan <ma...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > > >> Two #defs LAZY_INTERRUPT_ENABLED and > >> LAZY_INTERRUPT_DISABLED are added to be used > >> when updating paca->soft_enabled. > > This is a very nice patchset, but can this not be a new name? > > Thanks, but idea is from ben :) > Regarding the name, I looked at the initial patchset posted by > paul and took the name from it :). > > But will work on that, any suggestion for the name? I don't have a strong preference. LAZY_* is not horrible itself, it's just that softe variant is used elsewhere. I don't mind if you rename softe to something else completely (although Ben might). Allow me to apply the first coat of paint to the bikeshed: irq_disable_level IRQ_DISABLE_LEVEL_NONE IRQ_DISABLE_LEVEL_LINUX IRQ_DISABLE_LEVEL_PMU _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev