Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> writes: > On Monday, September 12, 2016 2:47:37 PM CEST Michael Ellerman wrote: >> >> @@ -1058,7 +1058,7 @@ static int mpc85xx_mc_err_probe(struct >> >> platform_device *op) >> >> >> >> pdata = mci->pvt_info; >> >> pdata->name = "mpc85xx_mc_err"; >> >> - pdata->irq = NO_IRQ; >> >> + pdata->irq = 0; >> >> mci->pdev = &op->dev; >> >> pdata->edac_idx = edac_mc_idx++; >> >> dev_set_drvdata(mci->pdev, mci); >> > >> > That part went into drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.c which is only the >> > freescale memory controller being shared between ARM and PPC, see >> > >> > http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/bp/bp.git/log/?h=for-next >> > >> > But that shouldn't change the issue wrt ->irq as now it is implicitly 0. >> >> Ah OK. >> >> NO_IRQ is -1 on ARM (or at least it can be?), see arch/arm/include/asm/irq.h. >> >> So I'll leave that one alone for now. > > I don't think there is any way to build the mpc85xx on ARM, it depends > on the powerpc-specific "FSL_SOC" symbol and it uses the in_be32/out_be32 > MMIO helpers that are not defined on ARM.
Yeah you're right. The common code between powerpc and arm64 is in fsl_ddr_edac.c, not mpc85xx_edac.c. There are no uses of NO_IRQ Will send a v2 with all uses removed from drivers/edac. cheers