On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:55 AM, Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au> wrote: > Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> writes: >> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 6:35 AM, Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au> >> wrote: >>> I'll do patches for everything above that's not drivers/soc or >>> include/soc and hopefully we can hear from someone at NXP on the plans >>> for getting the soc parts enabled on arm. >> >> I think the removal of the NO_IRQ references is a requirement for >> getting the drivers working properly on ARM, as the OF platform >> code will use '0' for invalid IRQs. > > OK. So the #define NO_IRQ (-1) in arch/arm/include/asm/irq.h is a red > herring and should be ignored for anything modern?
Correct. There are a couple of older (non-DT) platforms that still rely on it, and I also have patches for those, which I intend to revisit at some point. Arnd