On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 03:12:25PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> +u64 dma_direct_get_required_mask(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> + u64 max_dma = phys_to_dma_direct(dev, (max_pfn - 1) << PAGE_SHIFT);
>> +
>> + return (1ULL << (fls64(max_dma) - 1)) * 2 - 1;
>
> I think that may as well just use __fls64() - it seems reasonable to assume
> max_dma > 0. Otherwise,Is there any good reason to micro-optimize given that this isn't a fast path?
