On 27/09/18 16:30, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 03:30:20PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
+static gfp_t __dma_direct_optimal_gfp_mask(struct device *dev, u64
dma_mask,
+ u64 *phys_mask)
+{
+ if (force_dma_unencrypted())
+ *phys_mask = __dma_to_phys(dev, dma_mask);
+ else
+ *phys_mask = dma_to_phys(dev, dma_mask);
Maybe make phys_to_dma_direct() take u64 instead of phys_addr_t so we can
reuse it here?
This is a dma_to_phys and not a phys_to_dma.
Ugh, clearly it's time to stop reviewing patches for today... sorry :(
Robin.
