On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 03:30:20PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> +static gfp_t __dma_direct_optimal_gfp_mask(struct device *dev, u64
>> dma_mask,
>> + u64 *phys_mask)
>> +{
>> + if (force_dma_unencrypted())
>> + *phys_mask = __dma_to_phys(dev, dma_mask);
>> + else
>> + *phys_mask = dma_to_phys(dev, dma_mask);
>
> Maybe make phys_to_dma_direct() take u64 instead of phys_addr_t so we can
> reuse it here?This is a dma_to_phys and not a phys_to_dma.
