On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:46:29 -0500 Timur Tabi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jiri Slaby wrote: > > > Mainly because you can sleep inside locked mutex and because spinlock > > shouldn't > > be used for too many lines of code (busy waiting etc.). I think ldd3 will be > > more descriptive than me here :). > > Ok, I'll look into it. > > Andrew, do you want us to respin the patch, or would you be willing to let us > make the change in a follow-up patch? A fix against rc8-mm3 would be ideal for me. But a replacement patch is OK too - I'd convert that into an incremental so I can see what changed anyway. Others might find the replacement patch harder to review though... _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
