On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 10:36:43AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> From: Christian Ehrhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Hi Christian,
        A few comments 

> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c
> @@ -203,6 +203,24 @@
>       kvmppc_set_msr(vcpu, vcpu->arch.srr1);
>  }
>  
> +static int kvmppc_do_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +     int ret = 0;
> +
> +     switch (vcpu->arch.gpr[0]) {
> +     default:
> +             printk(KERN_ERR"unknown hypercall %d\n", vcpu->arch.gpr[0]);

I think the preffered style is printk(KERN_ERR "...)  You've made the
same style mistake in most of you printk()'s in your other patches
aswell.

Yours Tony

  linux.conf.au    http://www.marchsouth.org/
  Jan 19 - 24 2009 The Australian Linux Technical Conference!

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to