Tony Breeds wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 10:36:44AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Christian Ehrhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Hi Christian,
This adds the guest portion of the hypercall infrastructure, basically an
illegal instruction with a defined layout.
See http://kvm.qumranet.com/kvmwiki/PowerPC_Hypercall_ABI for more detail
on the hypercall ABI for powerpc.

Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---

[diffstat]
 kvm_para.h |   16 ++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)

[diff]
diff --git a/include/asm-powerpc/kvm_para.h b/include/asm-powerpc/kvm_para.h
--- a/include/asm-powerpc/kvm_para.h
+++ b/include/asm-powerpc/kvm_para.h
@@ -25,6 +25,8 @@
 #ifdef __KERNEL__
#include <linux/of.h>
+
+#define KVM_HYPERCALL_BIN 0x03ffffff

Ummm didn't you add this in patch 2 of 6?
This is just because I initially wanted to split Host & Guest patch series.
I need to separate my patches a bit more anyway for the next submission thanks for pointing out this duplication.

Yours Tony

  linux.conf.au    http://www.marchsouth.org/
  Jan 19 - 24 2009 The Australian Linux Technical Conference!



--

GrĂ¼sse / regards, Christian Ehrhardt
IBM Linux Technology Center, Open Virtualization

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to