On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:17:31AM +0200, Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > The aim is not really fixed. It would be nice to get into 2.6.27, but > since I can't yet expect how long it takes ...
Ahh okay, Id say given that we're 2/3rds through the merge window then 2.8.28 is a safer target. > Actually the guest patches would already go through reviews and > upstream, due to the fact that the guest code changes are not that (the > major part of the implementation will go over kvmppc -> kvm upstream). > But since I want to discuss about the standardization on the embedded > hypervisor list first, the naming of the device tree entries are not > fixed yet. Okay. When that's done we can take another look at them. > Therefor I can't yet define which kernel version merge window I'll > target/reach. > > btw - embedded hypervisor - I got advised that this is a closed list > which I forgot. ... snipped from this reply Yours Tony linux.conf.au http://www.marchsouth.org/ Jan 19 - 24 2009 The Australian Linux Technical Conference! _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev