On 11/14/23 12:42 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> No functional change in this patch. A helper is added to find if
> vcpu is dispatched by hypervisor. Use that instead of opencoding.
> Also clarify some of the comments.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.ku...@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/paravirt.h | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/paravirt.h 
> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/paravirt.h
> index ac4279208d63..b78b82d66057 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/paravirt.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/paravirt.h
> @@ -76,6 +76,17 @@ static inline bool is_vcpu_idle(int vcpu)
>  {
>       return lppaca_of(vcpu).idle;
>  }
> +
> +static inline bool vcpu_is_dispatched(int vcpu)
> +{
> +     /*
> +      * This is the yield_count.  An "odd" value (low bit on) means that
> +      * the processor is yielded (either because of an OS yield or a
> +      * hypervisor preempt).  An even value implies that the processor is
> +      * currently executing.
> +      */
> +     return (!(yield_count_of(vcpu) & 1));
> +}
>  #else
>  static inline bool is_shared_processor(void)
>  {
> @@ -109,6 +120,10 @@ static inline bool is_vcpu_idle(int vcpu)
>  {
>       return false;
>  }
> +static inline bool vcpu_is_dispatched(int vcpu)
> +{
> +     return true;
> +}
>  #endif
> 

Similar code can be changed in lib/qspinlock.c and lib/locks.c as well. 


>  #define vcpu_is_preempted vcpu_is_preempted
> @@ -134,12 +149,12 @@ static inline bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu)
>        * If the hypervisor has dispatched the target CPU on a physical
>        * processor, then the target CPU is definitely not preempted.
>        */
> -     if (!(yield_count_of(cpu) & 1))
> +     if (vcpu_is_dispatched(cpu))
>               return false;
> 
>       /*
> -      * If the target CPU has yielded to Hypervisor but OS has not
> -      * requested idle then the target CPU is definitely preempted.
> +      * if the target CPU is not dispatched and the guest OS
> +      * has not marked the CPU idle, then it is hypervisor preempted.
>        */
>       if (!is_vcpu_idle(cpu))
>               return true;
> @@ -166,7 +181,7 @@ static inline bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu)
> 
>               /*
>                * The PowerVM hypervisor dispatches VMs on a whole core
> -              * basis. So we know that a thread sibling of the local CPU
> +              * basis. So we know that a thread sibling of the executing CPU
>                * cannot have been preempted by the hypervisor, even if it
>                * has called H_CONFER, which will set the yield bit.
>                */
> @@ -174,15 +189,17 @@ static inline bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu)
>                       return false;
> 
>               /*
> -              * If any of the threads of the target CPU's core are not
> -              * preempted or ceded, then consider target CPU to be
> -              * non-preempted.
> +              * The specific target CPU was marked by guest OS as idle, but
> +              * then also check all other cpus in the core for PowerVM
> +              * because it does core scheduling and one of the vcpu
> +              * of the core getting preempted by hypervisor implies
> +              * other vcpus can also be considered preempted.
>                */
>               first_cpu = cpu_first_thread_sibling(cpu);
>               for (i = first_cpu; i < first_cpu + threads_per_core; i++) {
>                       if (i == cpu)
>                               continue;
> -                     if (!(yield_count_of(i) & 1))
> +                     if (vcpu_is_dispatched(i))
>                               return false;
>                       if (!is_vcpu_idle(i))
>                               return true;

Reply via email to