On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 10:10 +0100, Matthias Fuchs wrote: > > Adding this interrupt to the PCI node would make (logical) sense. But > on PCI adapter (add-in cards) designs we typically disable the PCI node > of the DT to disable PCI PnP. This should not prevent us from adding the > interrupt to the node but it looks a little bit weird to take an interrupt > from a disabled node, right?
You can make a pci-endpoint node that isn't detected as a host bridge. In fact, I think we have some way to even tell in the DT not to activate host bridge function on 44x nowadays no ? I dont remember for sure but it's easy enough to add. > > the actual PCI bridge, then you can stick an interrupts property in the > > PCI host bridge node in the DT just fine. > The PCI node already contains the interrupt-map for the PCI interrupts. Only relevant for master, not endpoint. > Doesn't adding a further interrupt property cause some trouble with the PCI > interrupts? Not for endpoint. Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev