On 10/19/26 4:59 AM, Wei Fang wrote:
Hello Wei,
+int enetc_mdio_update_mdc_div(struct mii_bus *bus) {
+ struct enetc_mdio_priv *mdio_priv = bus->priv;
+ struct device *dev = bus->parent;
+ struct clk *enet_clk;
+ u32 div, mdc_freq;
+
+ if (device_property_read_u32(dev, "clock-frequency", &mdc_freq))
+ return 0;
+
+ enet_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, NULL);
+ if (IS_ERR(enet_clk))
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(enet_clk),
+ "Input clock unknown, not changing MDC
frequency\n");
binding said clock is optional. If return failure here, it will block
existing dts, which have not clock property.
For EMDIO device, the clocks property is not added to
fsl,enetc-mdio.yaml, I suppose this property should be added to the
dt-binding doc if the clock is really needed here.
Isn't this what 1/2 in this series does ? (maybe I misunderstood this
paragraph)
Sorry, my email filtered out the 1/2 patch, so I missed it.
No worries.
For ENETC device, we already have a 'ref' clock in the enetc node, so
devm_clk_get(dev, NULL) may get the 'ref' clock rather than the system
clock of NETC.
Shouldn't the clock be described in the MDIO DT node ?
The enetc_mdio_read_* and enetc_mdio_write_* interfaces are not only
used by EMDIO devices, the ENETCs and NETC switches also use them.
NETC switches and ENETCs can access external PHYs or internal PCS/Serdes
through their own port MDIO registers, instead of through EMDIO devices.
Your first patch only modified the EMDIO binding-doc, not the ENETC and
switch binding-doc.
So I need to patch also
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/mscc,ocelot.yaml ? Any other
binding document ?
Thank you for your help !
