On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 09:41:14AM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
> > +                       8...@60 {
> > +                               device_type = "8042";
> > +                               reg = <1 0x00000060 0x00000001
> > +                                      1 0x00000064 0x00000001>;
> > +                               // IRQ1, IRQ12 (rising edge)
> > +                               interrupts = <1 3 12 3>;
> 
> For the flattened device tree, I think we've settled on the convention
> that every node with an IRQ connection should have both the
> interrupt-parent and interrupts properties.  (ie. don't rely on the
> parent node's interrupt-parent property.)

Why?

-Scott
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to