On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Scott Wood <scottw...@freescale.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 09:41:14AM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
>> > + 8...@60 {
>> > + device_type = "8042";
>> > + reg = <1 0x00000060 0x00000001
>> > + 1 0x00000064 0x00000001>;
>> > + // IRQ1, IRQ12 (rising edge)
>> > + interrupts = <1 3 12 3>;
>>
>> For the flattened device tree, I think we've settled on the convention
>> that every node with an IRQ connection should have both the
>> interrupt-parent and interrupts properties. (ie. don't rely on the
>> parent node's interrupt-parent property.)
>
> Why?
Defensive programming. To not rely on implicit relationships
g.
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
