On Apr 22, 2009, at 12:16 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
Kumar Gala wrote:
On Apr 22, 2009, at 12:04 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
Kumar Gala wrote:
If this has an elbc more recent than 1.0 (looks like it), we
should
indicate that here.
that might be the case, but I leave it to u-boot to do that.
Why? There's no p2020 with an older eLBC, and there's no block
version register.
But there might be a p2020 w/a newer eLBC version in the future.
At which point we can add something to u-boot -- but magic SVR
tables seem a step backward from the dts except where needed to
avoid the creation of extra dts files.
I don't see the value of complicating u-boot to have to parse and
"fixup" the compatible instead of just having to prepend to it.
Especially since I don't believe there is anything specific we care
about in the 1.2 version of elbc at this point.
- k
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
