There is already an architecture-independent __page_aligned_data macro
for this purpose, so removing the powerpc-specific macro should be
harmless.
Signed-off-by: Tim Abbott <tabb...@ksplice.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <b...@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <pau...@samba.org>
Cc: linuxppc-...@ozlabs.org
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <s...@ravnborg.org>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/page_64.h | 8 --------
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/page_64.h
b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/page_64.h
index 3f17b83..3c7118f 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/page_64.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/page_64.h
@@ -162,14 +162,6 @@ do { \
#endif /* !CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE */
-#ifdef MODULE
-#define __page_aligned __attribute__((__aligned__(PAGE_SIZE)))
-#else
-#define __page_aligned \
- __attribute__((__aligned__(PAGE_SIZE), \
- __section__(".data.page_aligned")))
-#endif
-
#define VM_DATA_DEFAULT_FLAGS \
(test_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT) ? \
VM_DATA_DEFAULT_FLAGS32 : VM_DATA_DEFAULT_FLAGS64)
--
1.6.4.3
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
