Well, I think I just found a bug in git-send-email. I'll resend with the
actual subject line.
-Tim Abbott
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009, Tim Abbott wrote:
> There is already an architecture-independent __page_aligned_data macro
> for this purpose, so removing the powerpc-specific macro should be
> harmless.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tim Abbott <tabb...@ksplice.com>
> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <b...@kernel.crashing.org>
> Cc: Paul Mackerras <pau...@samba.org>
> Cc: linuxppc-...@ozlabs.org
> Cc: Sam Ravnborg <s...@ravnborg.org>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/page_64.h | 8 --------
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/page_64.h
> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/page_64.h
> index 3f17b83..3c7118f 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/page_64.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/page_64.h
> @@ -162,14 +162,6 @@ do { \
>
> #endif /* !CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE */
>
> -#ifdef MODULE
> -#define __page_aligned __attribute__((__aligned__(PAGE_SIZE)))
> -#else
> -#define __page_aligned \
> - __attribute__((__aligned__(PAGE_SIZE), \
> - __section__(".data.page_aligned")))
> -#endif
> -
> #define VM_DATA_DEFAULT_FLAGS \
> (test_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT) ? \
> VM_DATA_DEFAULT_FLAGS32 : VM_DATA_DEFAULT_FLAGS64)
> --
> 1.6.4.3
>
>
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
