Hi,
On Thursday, November 19, 2009, Arnd wrote:
> In that case, add another entry for the device encoded in the firmware
> itself. The ns16550 entry should be the second one after a more
specific
> one telling which device it is exactly.
>
Is the following better?
---
[PATCH] Xilinx 16550 UART is actually 16550A-compatible
diff --git a/drivers/serial/of_serial.c b/drivers/serial/of_serial.c
index 02406ba..40bf8f4 100644
--- a/drivers/serial/of_serial.c
+++ b/drivers/serial/of_serial.c
@@ -161,6 +161,7 @@ static int of_platform_serial_remove(struct
of_device *ofdev)
static struct of_device_id __devinitdata of_platform_serial_table[] = {
{ .type = "serial", .compatible = "ns8250", .data = (void
*)PORT_8250, },
{ .type = "serial", .compatible = "ns16450", .data = (void
*)PORT_16450, },
+ { .type = "serial", .compatible = "xlnx,xps-uart16550-2.00.b",
.data = (void *)PORT_16550A, },
{ .type = "serial", .compatible = "ns16550", .data = (void
*)PORT_16550, },
{ .type = "serial", .compatible = "ns16750", .data = (void
*)PORT_16750, },
{ .type = "serial", .compatible = "ns16850", .data = (void
*)PORT_16850, },
**********************************************************************************************
IMPORTANT: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential.
They are intended for the
named recipient(s) only.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the system manager or
the sender immediately and do
not disclose the contents to anyone or make copies thereof.
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
