>-----Original Message----- >From: Artem Bityutskiy [mailto:dedeki...@gmail.com] >Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 4:51 PM >To: Kumar Gala >Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; Li Yang-R58472; Liu Shuo-B35362; linux- >ker...@vger.kernel.org Kernel; linux-...@lists.infradead.org; Andrew >Morton; David Woodhouse; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org list >Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Integrated Flash Controller support > >On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 19:47 -0600, Kumar Gala wrote: >> As Scott said, I was more asking about the 2nd patch in the sequence >> which did touch MTD. Since that one is dependent on this patch, >> wondering how we wanted to handle them. > >I do not have time to review it, but it looks OK, so I'd suggest to >merge it vie the same tree as the rest of the patches.
Hi Artem, So what is your suggestion on this patch? Can we regard your previous email as an ACK and merge it through the powerpc tree? Or do you prefer to merge them through the MTD tree with Kumar's ACK instead? - Leo _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
