On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 11:13 +0000, Li Yang-R58472 wrote: > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Artem Bityutskiy [mailto:dedeki...@gmail.com] > >Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 4:51 PM > >To: Kumar Gala > >Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; Li Yang-R58472; Liu Shuo-B35362; linux- > >ker...@vger.kernel.org Kernel; linux-...@lists.infradead.org; Andrew > >Morton; David Woodhouse; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org list > >Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Integrated Flash Controller support > > > >On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 19:47 -0600, Kumar Gala wrote: > >> As Scott said, I was more asking about the 2nd patch in the > sequence > >> which did touch MTD. Since that one is dependent on this patch, > >> wondering how we wanted to handle them. > > > >I do not have time to review it, but it looks OK, so I'd suggest to > >merge it vie the same tree as the rest of the patches. > > Hi Artem, > > So what is your suggestion on this patch? Can we regard your previous > email as an ACK and merge it through the powerpc tree? Or do you > prefer to merge them through the MTD tree with Kumar's ACK instead?
I am fine if it is merged via PPC tree. I do not have bandwith to look at it closely, so I cannot ack it, although I also do not have reasons to nack it :-) -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev