Hi,
Fabio Estevam writes:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Peter Chen <peter.c...@freescale.com> wrote:
>
> > /* make sure USB_CLK is running at 60 MHz +/- 1000 Hz */
> > - if (!cpu_is_mx51()) {
> > + if (!strcmp(pdev->id_entry->name, "imx-udc-mx27")) {]]
>
> Shouldn't this be:
> if (!strcmp(pdev->id_entry->name, "imx-udc-mx51"))
>
The equivalent of !cpu_is_mx51() would be
strcmp(pdev->id_entry->name, "imx-udc-mx51") (without the '!') meaning
id_entry->name is different from "imx-udc-mx51".
I personally hate the '!strcmp()' notation and prefer 'strcmp() == 0'
though they are technically equivalent. Using '==' makes it much
clearer to the reader what is intended.
!strcmp() lets one assume that it is true when the comparison fails,
though actually the opposite is true.
Lothar Waßmann
--
___________________________________________________________
Ka-Ro electronics GmbH | Pascalstraße 22 | D - 52076 Aachen
Phone: +49 2408 1402-0 | Fax: +49 2408 1402-10
Geschäftsführer: Matthias Kaussen
Handelsregistereintrag: Amtsgericht Aachen, HRB 4996
www.karo-electronics.de | i...@karo-electronics.de
___________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
