On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Lothar Waßmann <l...@karo-electronics.de> wrote:
> The equivalent of !cpu_is_mx51() would be > strcmp(pdev->id_entry->name, "imx-udc-mx51") (without the '!') meaning > id_entry->name is different from "imx-udc-mx51". Yes, agree. strcmp(pdev->id_entry->name, "imx-udc-mx51") is also better than !strcmp(pdev->id_entry->name, "imx-udc-mx27")) because in the case of another soc entry gets added, let's say "imx-udc-mxyy" then !strcmp(pdev->id_entry->name, "imx-udc-mx27")) will not correspond to !cpu_is_mx51() anymore. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
