On 07/15/2014 06:54 AM, Peter Hurley wrote: > > Jonathan Corbet wrote a LWN article about this back in 2012: > http://lwn.net/Articles/478657/ > > I guess it's fixed in gcc 4.8, but too bad there's not a workaround for > earlier compilers (akin to -fstrict_volatile_bitfields without requiring > the volatile keyword)
>From the gcc pr, it looks like the patch was backported to 4.7. But we didn't fix it in versions earlier than that. r~ _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
