Yo Jacob!

On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 22:58:03 +0000
"Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.kel...@intel.com> wrote:

> > Hmm, no secondary sources?  How do you know you do not have the
> > large offset I see?
> 
> I am wondering if maybe it is because your provided PTP source wasn't
> in PTP timescale, so you might try the -O 0 option?

-O is in whole seconds, my issue is 100s of mSec.

Chrony refuses to sync to my timestamp hardware port, so it just 
freesuns.  Short term, very little jitter, long term wander of just under
one Second.  I have seen from about +800 mSec to about -400 mSec.

And I know my source is good, other timestamp software clients getting
6 uSec jitter and sub mSec offset.

RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97701
        g...@rellim.com  Tel:+1(541)382-8588

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
Linuxptp-devel mailing list
Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel

Reply via email to