Hi Jeff The fixes are not crucial. They are more for a special setup and condition. If you're not able to include it today for RC3, then I'm ok to not include it for RC4/SR1. Just to be on the save side.
Linux Tools 1.2 is also coming in November and then we'll have the fixes in. Thanks Bernd On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Jeff Johnston <jjohn...@redhat.com> wrote: > The system is not automated. I test aggregation and then make that the > stable build. We are in RC3 now and should be stabilizing. > > What bug fixes did you make? Are they crucial? Today is +3 aggregation day > and > I can't seem to log into build.eclipse.org. There is a chance I can get it > in today, but I am not having success in logging into build.eclipse.org and > staying logged in. > > Next week is the last aggregation build. If we fail aggregation then we are > in big trouble so if I can't get your stuff in today, you will have to > justify the changes are crucial for RC4. Note that the RC4 build will > become 1.1.1. > > Don't forget that users can still get fixes via updates-nightly-juno after > SR1 is released. > > -- Jeff J. > > > On 09/12/2012 12:51 PM, Bernd Hufmann wrote: >> >> Hello >> >> Which build are we planning to use for SR1 RC4? I'm asking that >> because RC3 was build and labelled on Hudson on September 6th. >> However, I pushed 2 bugfixes for LTTng to stable-1.1 on September 7th. >> I was hoping that these fixes would be included in the release. Please >> let me know. >> >> Thanks >> Bernd >> >> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Jeff Johnston<jjohn...@redhat.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Sure, as discussed, if I can make it work without causing an update issue >>> from SR0 to SR1. >>> >>> -- Jeff J. >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Aleksandar Kurtakov"<akurt...@redhat.com> >>> To: "Linux Tools developer discussions"<linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org> >>> Sent: Thursday, August 9, 2012 4:12:52 AM >>> Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Juno SR1 Release >>> >>> Having 1.1.1 released for just this change and submitted as our SR1 >>> contribution sounds like the right thing to do? >>> Jeff, do you want to do it ? >>> >>> Alex >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> >>>> From: "Andrew Overholt"<overh...@gmail.com> >>>> To: "Linux Tools developer discussions"<linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org> >>>> Sent: Thursday, August 9, 2012 1:23:40 AM >>>> Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Juno SR1 Release >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> I personally have a patch to add a C-only version of the ChangeLog >>>>> feature which could be used by the SR! CPP EPP package so as not >>>>> to drag in any JDT stuff. >>>> >>>> This seems very important to me. >>>> >>>> Andrew >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> linuxtools-dev mailing list >>>> linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org >>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> linuxtools-dev mailing list >>> linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org >>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev >>> _______________________________________________ >>> linuxtools-dev mailing list >>> linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org >>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> linuxtools-dev mailing list >> linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > linuxtools-dev mailing list > linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev _______________________________________________ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
