Thank you very much Bernd
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Jeff Johnston <jjohn...@redhat.com> wrote: > I managed to update the build. I broke the then on-going Hudson build by > fiddling with the contents of the Linux Tools SR1 repo at the same time, > but the following build with my change just went through successfully. > > -- Jeff J. > > > On 09/12/2012 01:51 PM, Bernd Hufmann wrote: >> >> Hi Jeff >> >> The fixes are not crucial. They are more for a special setup and >> condition. If you're not able to include it today for RC3, then I'm ok >> to not include it for RC4/SR1. Just to be on the save side. >> >> Linux Tools 1.2 is also coming in November and then we'll have the fixes >> in. >> >> Thanks >> Bernd >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Jeff Johnston<jjohn...@redhat.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> The system is not automated. I test aggregation and then make that the >>> stable build. We are in RC3 now and should be stabilizing. >>> >>> What bug fixes did you make? Are they crucial? Today is +3 aggregation >>> day >>> and >>> I can't seem to log into build.eclipse.org. There is a chance I can get >>> it >>> in today, but I am not having success in logging into build.eclipse.org >>> and >>> staying logged in. >>> >>> Next week is the last aggregation build. If we fail aggregation then we >>> are >>> in big trouble so if I can't get your stuff in today, you will have to >>> justify the changes are crucial for RC4. Note that the RC4 build will >>> become 1.1.1. >>> >>> Don't forget that users can still get fixes via updates-nightly-juno >>> after >>> SR1 is released. >>> >>> -- Jeff J. >>> >>> >>> On 09/12/2012 12:51 PM, Bernd Hufmann wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello >>>> >>>> Which build are we planning to use for SR1 RC4? I'm asking that >>>> because RC3 was build and labelled on Hudson on September 6th. >>>> However, I pushed 2 bugfixes for LTTng to stable-1.1 on September 7th. >>>> I was hoping that these fixes would be included in the release. Please >>>> let me know. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Bernd >>>> >>>> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Jeff Johnston<jjohn...@redhat.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Sure, as discussed, if I can make it work without causing an update >>>>> issue >>>>> from SR0 to SR1. >>>>> >>>>> -- Jeff J. >>>>> >>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>> From: "Aleksandar Kurtakov"<akurt...@redhat.com> >>>>> To: "Linux Tools developer discussions"<linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org> >>>>> Sent: Thursday, August 9, 2012 4:12:52 AM >>>>> Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Juno SR1 Release >>>>> >>>>> Having 1.1.1 released for just this change and submitted as our SR1 >>>>> contribution sounds like the right thing to do? >>>>> Jeff, do you want to do it ? >>>>> >>>>> Alex >>>>> >>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>>> >>>>>> From: "Andrew Overholt"<overh...@gmail.com> >>>>>> To: "Linux Tools developer discussions"<linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org> >>>>>> Sent: Thursday, August 9, 2012 1:23:40 AM >>>>>> Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Juno SR1 Release >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> I personally have a patch to add a C-only version of the ChangeLog >>>>>>> feature which could be used by the SR! CPP EPP package so as not >>>>>>> to drag in any JDT stuff. >>>>>> >>>>>> This seems very important to me. >>>>>> >>>>>> Andrew >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> linuxtools-dev mailing list >>>>>> linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org >>>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> linuxtools-dev mailing list >>>>> linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org >>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> linuxtools-dev mailing list >>>>> linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org >>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> linuxtools-dev mailing list >>>> linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org >>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> linuxtools-dev mailing list >>> linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org >>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> linuxtools-dev mailing list >> linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > linuxtools-dev mailing list > linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev _______________________________________________ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
