But your response does not make sense. :) KDE has no Mono which is a big plus and that opens up another big can of worms. If anyone thinks that KDE or GNOME debate is argumentative, just see how people get worked up about Mono. There are many anti-Mono websites. People devote their lives to bashing Mono. Richard Stallman has even called Miguel de Icaza a "traitor" to FOSS over Mono and others call him a Microsoft apologist or even an "employee". These are two of the biggest names in open source. It does not get better than this. :)
KDE or GNOME? Use what you like and like what you use. I use both and like both for different reasons. So why choose between them when you can have both? Roy On 31 August 2010 06:19, kishan KISHAN <[email protected]> wrote: > Gnome . Reason : It makes more sense > > > On Monday, August 30, 2010, rijin mp <[email protected]> wrote: >> KDE >> >> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Linux Users >> Group. >> To post a message, send email to [email protected] >> To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] >> For more options, visit our group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/linuxusersgroup > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Linux Users Group. > To post a message, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] > For more options, visit our group at > http://groups.google.com/group/linuxusersgroup -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Linux Users Group. To post a message, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit our group at http://groups.google.com/group/linuxusersgroup
