Dnia 15 Lutego 2012, 12:06 am, Śr, Peter Hutterer napisał(a): > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 04:01:17PM -0600, Chris Bagwell wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Przemo Firszt <prz...@firszt.eu> wrote: >> > Please comment if you're OK with the name or it should be rather >> "Wacom >> > Intuos4 WL" or maybe something else. >> >> Here is what I thinking. You current code is geared that it can >> easily be reused for new versions of HW as long as the continue to use >> the Intous4 packet format. >> >> The phrase "Wacom PKT-540WL" will only be valid value for a single HW >> Product ID. The phrase "Wacom Intuos4 WL" will be valid for multiple >> HW Product ID's. > > tbh, I'd prefer a more detailed over a more generic name. filtering in > userspace is easy, adding information is hard.
Ok, what about "Wacom Intuos4 WL PTK-540WL"? Existing .conf file catches it, we have info about "market" name [Intuos4 WL] and about proper model name [PTK-540WL] Only downside is that it's a bit long, but I cant see that as a major problem. -- Regards, Przemo Firszt ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/ _______________________________________________ Linuxwacom-devel mailing list Linuxwacom-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxwacom-devel
