Bastien Nocera said the following on 01/29/2013 10:13 AM: >> So I see no reason for the library to complain loudly. And fact is it >> passes "make check" just fine with this (I did try before posting my >> reply, though). > I meant the "make sure you remove your added definition first".
Ah sorry, I thought you meant the whole suggestion should fail and the library should complain loudly. So we actually agree on the possibility of adding the new USB Id to the existing definition? Pander if you could just test as we said, make sure you remove your added definition first and apply the patch I sent previously... I would like to make sure it actually works for you before ppl can decide what would be the best fix ;-) Cheers, Olivier. -- əɔıʌəp əɯos ɥʇıʍ əɹəɥʍəɯos ɯoɹɟ ʇuəs ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnnow-d2d _______________________________________________ Linuxwacom-devel mailing list Linuxwacom-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxwacom-devel
