On 2013-01-29 10:33, Olivier Fourdan wrote: > Bastien Nocera said the following on 01/29/2013 10:13 AM: >>> So I see no reason for the library to complain loudly. And fact is it >>> passes "make check" just fine with this (I did try before posting my >>> reply, though). >> I meant the "make sure you remove your added definition first". > > Ah sorry, I thought you meant the whole suggestion should fail and the > library should complain loudly. So we actually agree on the possibility > of adding the new USB Id to the existing definition? > > Pander if you could just test as we said, make sure you remove your > added definition first and apply the patch I sent previously... I would > like to make sure it actually works for you before ppl can decide what > would be the best fix ;-)
I will check and report back later. > Cheers, > Olivier. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnnow-d2d _______________________________________________ Linuxwacom-devel mailing list Linuxwacom-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxwacom-devel
