Parenthesizing "OAM" would be fine with the text I suggest. Dino
> On Jun 4, 2015, at 1:00 AM, Luigi Iannone <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> On 04 Jun 2015, at 07:26, Dino Farinacci <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Jun 3, 2015, at 6:24 PM, Ross Callon <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Does this sound about right? >>> >> >> I think the text you suggest is fine. But we haven't ever used the term >> "OAM" before. I would like all the documentation to be consistent so would >> suggest using "RLOC reach ability mechanisms”. > > Hi Dino, > > I understand your point, but may be OAM is a more general term that covers > the RLOC reachability case. > > yet, if it is fine with Ross I guess we can use “RLOC reachability”. > > ciao > > L. > > >> >> Dino >
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
