Excellent. We will use “RLOC reachability mechanisms”
Thanks. ciao L. > On 04 Jun 2015, at 17:22, Ross Callon <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yup. "RLOC reachability mechanisms" sounds like the right term in this case. > > Thanks, Ross > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dino Farinacci [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 11:20 AM > To: Ross Callon > Cc: Luigi Iannone; LISP mailing list list > Subject: Re: [lisp] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lisp-impact-02 > > > >> On Jun 4, 2015, at 8:16 AM, Ross Callon <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Thus it seems fine to me to replace “OAM” with “RLOC reachability” in the >> proposed text. > > As written it is a noun. I indicated "RLOC reachability mechanisms". > > Dino _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
