Yup. "RLOC reachability mechanisms" sounds like the right term in this case.
Thanks, Ross -----Original Message----- From: Dino Farinacci [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 11:20 AM To: Ross Callon Cc: Luigi Iannone; LISP mailing list list Subject: Re: [lisp] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lisp-impact-02 > On Jun 4, 2015, at 8:16 AM, Ross Callon <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thus it seems fine to me to replace “OAM” with “RLOC reachability” in the > proposed text. As written it is a noun. I indicated "RLOC reachability mechanisms". Dino _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
