Hi! In general, I like the charter. However, I have some questions/comments:
(1) What’s the difference between the work items in “Part 1” and the ones in “Part 2”? (2) Related. I’m assuming that the headers “Proposed Charter…” will be deleted. (3) Multicast support. It’s not clear from the description if the work is just to merge the experimental RFCs or if there’s something else. ? (4) LISP Applicability. How will "the most recent and relevant use-cases” be determined? I don’t think we need to answer, but the question may come up later in the process. (5) Maybe reorder the work items to coincide with the order of the milestones. (6) "LISP geo-coordinates” doesn’t map to a work item. I don’t have write access to the repo, so I’m attaching diffs with some editorial points. Thanks! Alvaro. On October 1, 2023 at 1:46:22 PM, Padma Pillay-Esnault (padma.i...@gmail.com) wrote: Hello all, We have created a repository to gather input for the proposed LISP WG charter presented in our last meeting. A pointer to the repo below https://github.com/lisp-wg/wg-charter We welcome your comments and contributions. Thanks Padma and Luigi _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list lisp@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
<<< text/html; charset="UTF-8"; name="ad28c1db-4fd7-440d-acc8-eae8bbb99a7e.html": Unrecognized >>>
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list lisp@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
