Hi, I think so. The best option is to list them in the same order as the milestones.
I will try to propose a new order today/tomorrow CIao > On Oct 11, 2023, at 13:26, Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal) <na...@cisco.com> > wrote: > > Padma, > > Just to confirm, is the end goal to have a single list of items then? (that > is, not divided into two groups) > > Thanks, > Alberto > > From: Padma Pillay-Esnault <padma.i...@gmail.com > <mailto:padma.i...@gmail.com>> > Date: Friday, October 6, 2023 at 4:14 AM > To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.i...@gmail.com <mailto:aretana.i...@gmail.com>> > Cc: LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>>, > lisp-cha...@ietf.org <mailto:lisp-cha...@ietf.org> <lisp-cha...@ietf.org > <mailto:lisp-cha...@ietf.org>> > Subject: Re: [lisp] Proposed WG Charter on GitHub > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 5:14 PM Alvaro Retana <aretana.i...@gmail.com > <mailto:aretana.i...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > (1) What’s the difference between the work items in “Part 1” and the ones in > “Part 2”? > > PPE - originally we had in part 1 work that were promised and part 2 grouping > work in progress. Will fix the document and remove the "part" for clarity.
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list lisp@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
